Showing posts with label UNSC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNSC. Show all posts

Indians safe in Syria, no travel advisory for now

From Left, the clipping from The Asian Age; the International page of the Bengaluru edition of Deccan Chronicle; and the clipping of the article from the edition

New Delhi

4 August 2011

Some Indian nationals living in Syria have shifted from the city of Hama, which has witnessed protests, to Aleppo, the largest city after the capital Damascus.

Similarly, a few Indians living in the Syrian province of Deir ez-Zor have moved to safer areas in the same province following the recent unrest.

There are about 1,000 Indian nationals in Syria and all of them were reported to be safe. There were no reports of casualties or injuries to Indian nationals.

A majority of the Indian nationals, about 600 of them, including their families, are located at the Shia shrine of Sayidda Zeinab, on the outskirts of Damascus, where they learn the religious scriptures.

Some 300-odd Indians live in Damascus, and another 35, mostly oil workers, in the province of Deir ez-Zor. The remaining Indian nationals are scattered across Syria.

Unlike some countries, India does not intend to issue a travel advisory warning its nationals to leave Syria or to not to travel to Syria. Their evacuation is ruled out for now.

New Delhi has sought to justify its stand by saying that its assessment is different from that of some other countries whose decisions are clouded by political factors. It has determined, using its mission in Damascus and other means, that the situation inside Syria is not as bad as it is made out to be by a section of media, mostly based in the US and Europe. Also, the casualty figures are exaggerated by the particular section of media.

There were only pockets of protests, and the capital Damascus and Aleppo, two of Syria's largest cities, have remained quiet. Moreover, the families of diplomats of some countries, who had been asked to leave Syria following the outbreak of violence, were reported to be returning to Damascus. At the same time, India does not anticipate a problem in relocating its nationals from Syria if the situation worsens because their population is small, unlike Egypt, Libya or Yemen.

The sentiments of India, which is the president of the United Nations security council (UNSC) for the month of August, are shared by some other non-permanent UNSC members who have since issued a presidential statement, as opposed to a resolution, voicing its concern over the developments in Syria.

After the 2006 vote against Iran, India abstains on Syria, but questions remain







(L) President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, and, on the right, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano


New Delhi
10 June 2011

India abstained in Thursday's (9 June 2011) vote in the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), which decided to report Syria to the United Nations security
council (UNSC) over its alleged covert nuclear programme.

The 35-member board of governors of the Vienna-based UN nuclear watchdog decided by
a 17-to-six vote, with 11 abstentions, to refer Syria to the UNSC for building an
undeclared nuclear reactor at a site in Dair Alzour (which was unilaterally destroyed by
Israel in 2007), for not allowing the IAEA to carry out investigations, and for not adhering
to its safeguards agreements.

The last time the IAEA reported a member-state to the UNSC was Iran in February 2006.
India's votes against Iran had been widely criticised at home, but Thursday's abstention
did not go unchallenged either.

A section of the official circles described India's decision to abstain, and to not cast a 'no
vote' along with Russia and the others, as being dictated by a desire to keep the US and
Israel in good humour. It felt that the IAEA vote was meant to bully President Bashar al-
Assad of Syria into submission and to set in motion a process to effect a regime change
(similar to Libya) in order to disrupt the Syria-Iran axis.

However, New Delhi defended itself by maintaining that states were required to comply
with safeguards obligations and it has consistently been against clandestine
proliferation. At the same time, it pointed out, scope for dialogue should be fully utilised.

The IAEA's referral of Syria to the UNSC should be seen in the context of the attempts by
the West to push for a UNSC resolution condemning Syria's crackdown on protesters.
With Russia indicating that it might veto any such UNSC resolution against Syria, New
Delhi was of the opinion that putting it to vote in the 15-member UNSC, of which India is a
non-permanent member, would be pointless.

In Thursday's vote, 17 countries voted for reporting Syria to the UNSC. They were: the
US, the UK, France, the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, Germany, Italy, Japan, South
Korea, Australia, Belgium, Cameron, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, and the UAE.
Six countries voted against the motion: China, Russia, Pakistan, Ecuador, Venezuela
and Azerbaijan. India and 10 other countries abstained, which included Argentina, Brazil,
Chile, South Africa, Peru, Jordan, Kenya, Niger, Tunisia, and Ukraine. Mongolia was absent from the vote.