Protocol least of India's worries, open to hosting Hina Rabbani Khar for talks with SM Krishna in July

Hina Rabbani Khar
* 34-year-old young politician
* went to the University of Massachusetts

* loves trekking

Somanahalli Mallaiah Krishna

* 79-year-old veteran politician

* went to Southern Methodist University and George Washington Univ. Law School

* loves tennis

New Delhi

19 June 2011

India would not mind setting aside protocol to host Hina Rabbani Khar, the 34-year-old minister of state for foreign affairs of Pakistan, for talks with external affairs minister SM Krishna (79) in July.

Ms Khar assumed the position on February 1 this year and she has been heading the foreign ministry from February 13 onwards, two days after Shah Mehmood Qureshi was dropped as Pakistan's foreign minister.

A government source recalled that India had deputed Khurshed Alam Khan, a minister of state of external affairs, to travel to Islamabad in 1986 for talks with Sahabzada Yaqub Khan, the then foreign minister of Pakistan.

However, if certain Pakistani media reports are anything to go by, Ms Khar could be elevated to Cabinet rank in the coming weeks. In contrast, ironically, is the speculation in a section of the Indian media about whether Mr Krishna would retain the portfolio after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh reshuffles his Cabinet soon.

Meanwhile, New Delhi has iterated that it will be seeking a satisfactory closure of the November 26, 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai when foreign secretary Nirupama Rao travels to Islamabad for talks with her Pakistani counterpart on June 23 and 24.

It described the foreign secretaries' talks as a process, not an event in itself, and as a means to reduce the trust deficit ahead of an eventual resolution of the outstanding issues dogging the two nations.

The cabinet committee on security met on Thursday to approve the scope and agenda of Ms Rao's meeting in Islamabad. Similarly, the Pakistani government is expected to firm up its agenda for the talks on Monday.

The foreign secretaries will discuss, among other issues, peace and security, including confidence building measures; Jammu and Kashmir; and promotion of friendly exchanges.

New Delhi has indicated that the talks would cover all issues of mutual concern and that Ms Rao can be expected to raise issues, including, but not limited to, the continuing threat posed by terrorism.

The Indian assertion came the day after the Pakistani foreign ministry's spokeswoman said that terrorism would not be a part of the agenda because matters relating to terrorism had already been discussed by the home secretaries.

SM Krishna seeks a meeting with Suu Kyi, but prospects dim

New Delhi

19 June 2011

External affairs minister SM Krishna has sought a meeting with Burmese pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, but New Delhi would not confirm Sunday whether its request has been accepted. Mr Krishna, accompanied by foreign secretary Nirupama Rao and other officials, will visit Burma on June 20 and 21. The minister last visited Burma in December 2009.

The uncertainty about a possible meeting with Ms Suu Kyi was attributed to the terms of an agreement she was understood to have reached with the Burmese military regime prior to her release from house arrest in November 2010, one of which was that she would not meet foreign government leaders. If the Krishna-Suu Kyi meeting does take place, it will be the first high-level contact with the Burmese opposition leader in over two decades.

A government source said Mr Krishna could be expected to discuss issues such as security, connectivity, and infrastructure projects in what will be the first visit to Burma by an Indian minister after the military junta handed over power on March 30 this year to a nominally civilian government. Specifically, the source said, New Delhi would be keen to understand the new Burmese government's priorities and outlook.

Over the past few months foreign governments and organisations have reached out to Burma by sending special envoys or other officials. A European Union delegation was expected to visit Burma at around the same time as the Indian delegation. United States Republican senator John McCain visited Burma in the first week of June, and United
Nations secretary general's special envoy Vijay Nambiar and US deputy assistant secretary of state Joseph Yun were there in May.

President Thein Sein of Burma visited China in May, and it is likely that he would visit New Delhi at the invitation of the Indian government. Than Shwe was the last Burmese leader to visit India in July 2010.

Meanwhile, Ms Suu Kyi celebrated her birthday Sunday in freedom for the first time in many years. In a video message that was screened at a function organised by Burmese democracy activists in New Delhi Sunday evening, Ms Suu Kyi urged Indians to help restore human rights and democracy in Burma.

'26/11 was the low point of my stay in India'

The battle against terrorism will require concerted international action of all likeminded countries as it is a battle that we cannot afford to lose, says MARK SOFER, Israel's outgoing ambassador in New Delhi, as he prepares to leave India soon after spending four years here. In an interview to RAMESH RAMACHANDRAN, he talks of how the “dynamic“ relationship between the two countries “is now going places“. Excerpts:

Q: How would you describe the Israel-India relations today, and what are some of the high and low points of your tenure?

A: It is a relationship in motion, which started before I came of course, but clearly, it has an enormous dynamic of its own. If you look at the basic facts and figures, the bilateral civilian trade has reached $5 billion. We are working on a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Next year will be the 20th anniversary of the establishment of India-Israel relations, and, hopefully around that time we will be able to conclude the (FTA) negotiations. Some experts estimate that bilateral civilian trade will triple in the next three or four years, so we are talking $15 billion worth of civilian trade. And the trade is finely balanced in terms of imports and exports, and it will include such things as investment, services, and goods. In agriculture, a centre of excellence is already up and running in Karnal, Haryana; a second centre will open in Sirsa, also in Haryana; and a third probably will be in Nagpur in Maharashtra. We are also looking at Tamil Nadu. I mean — the sky is the limit. And, now we are embarking on a new negotiation process for an MoU (memorandum of understanding) in dairy farming, etc.

So, basically, in every field of human endeavour, this relationship is in a dynamic mode. It didn’t start with me and it won’t end with me; I am just in the middle of it. So this is a relationship that is going places. One of the real high points in my four years here has been the opening of the agricultural centre in Haryana. A vast population of India is dependent on farming. At the end of the day, embassies and countries interact to better the lives of their peoples, and if we can cooperate on the main issue which faces the Indian economy and social world, which is agriculture of course, this gives me the greatest pleasure. There is nothing more inspiring or heart-warming than seeing farmers from far and wide coming to look at Israeli technologies and incorporating them into their own smallholdings. We all like to deal with geostrategic issues, but, sometimes, it is these things, the nitty-gritty, that make a term of duty the beauty that it is.

If you ask me, it has been the most wonderful four years of my life working with the Indian government and people on not just issues related to West Asia but related to the welfare of people, such as water, alternative energy, agriculture, technology and industry. I think that there is no doubt in my mind that the low point of my stay here was the Mumbai attacks; of that there is no doubt. Our prayers are with the families of those Indians that were killed, but the Jewish people also were specifically targeted in that atrocity.

Q: How will the killing of Osama bin Laden affect the war on terrorism in general, and the situation in West Asia in particular?

A: The world is a better place now that Osama bin Laden is no longer with us. But does it mean the end of terrorism? Of course it does not. Other such fanatics will come out of the woodwork, they are already coming out of the woodwork, already planning new attacks. The way to tackle it is concerted unified international action of all like-minded countries. This is a battle that we cannot afford to lose.

Q: US President Barack Obama’s speeches on the West Asia peace process have not gone down well with the Israeli government. How do you see the Israel-Palestine peace process going forward?

A: This relationship is rock-solid. There is no rift. There are differences of opinion, which are natural; there are differences of opinion between friends and even inside a family. That is a normal process; so one should be careful not to over-dramatise it. If someone is trying to find fissures (between the United States and Israel), it will be very hard to find them, but that is not to suggest that we agree on everything. But, yes, we are at a crossroads. We do believe strongly in Israel that we urgently need to get back to the negotiating table. There is no point in putting preconditions down because if we all start doing that, then we are predetermining the outcome of the negotiations before they actually have taken off in any seriousness. So we really have a great deal of difficulty in understanding in all honesty why all of a sudden the Palestinian Authority has placed this condition or that condition. Second, this agreement between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas is something that places us backwards. Hamas, in a way, is West Asia’s Al Qaeda. It is an extremist organisation dedicated to the eradication of the State of Israel and is anti-Semitic by its own charter and it has not moved one iota from the demands of the international community that it accept Israel’s existence, that it accept previous agreements reached between Israelis and Palestinians, and stop massacring people. I must stress that these are not conditions placed by Israel; these are placed by the Quartet, by the international community, on Hamas, and they have not met them. We do see in Mahmoud Abbas a serious and pragmatic partner, we do see in the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organisation) an institution with which we can achieve peace, but we do not at this stage at all (visualise) the Hamas entering into that arena.

Q: How does Israel view the Palestinians’ move to seek a vote in the United Nations recognising Palestine as a sovereign country?

A: We, of course, disagree with it entirely. We don’t have dozens of countries that will support us. A former foreign minister of Israel, Abba Eban, has said that if Israel were to propose in the UN that the world was round, the UN will vote that it was flat. Anything [that is done] in the UN is a priori geared against Israel. We believe the way for the establishment of a Palestinian state should be through negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, that is the way to move forward. Actually we are not that far apart: we both agree on a two-state solution. But, of course, the devil is in the details. A lot of discussion is necessary, and it is not going to be easy, but scoring points is not going to move forward any type of peace process in West Asia.

Q: How do you see the emergence of representative governments following the popular uprisings in Israel’s neighbourhood?

A: I think a moving away from authoritarian leadership towards democracy is almost automatically positive. It cannot be negative when people are able to find an expression of their views and freedoms that were denied to them. This has to be positive and I think there will be positive spinoffs as well.

Q: The US and the European Union have imposed further sanctions on Iran. How would you describe the current thinking in Israel on Iran?

A: There is a difference between the people of Iran and the regime, and one must make this distinction. It is so tragic that they have at the helm a leadership of hate, a regime dedicated to the destruction of Israel, denying the Holocaust, striving for nuclear arms in order to carry out the destruction of the world’s only Jewish country. Why should we sit idly by when this is happening? And we won’t. The Jewish people have suffered throughout history at attempts to annihilate. Our supposed annihilators have always been annihilated. We will never lose in this struggle against those who would do us ill. When we say never again after the Holocaust, we mean never again. And when (Iran talks about) killing and murdering Israelis, it is something that we cannot of course take, and watch idly as it does this.

India sticks to kid-glove Lanka policy

New Delhi

17 May 2011

India omitted any reference to a contentious United Nations (UN)-mandated experts' panel in the joint press statement issued towards the end of Sri Lankan foreign minister GL Peiris' visit to New Delhi, which should be seen as in keeping with its policy lately of treating Colombo with kid gloves.

The statement merely cited external affairs minister SM Krishna as saying, cryptically, about investigations into allegations of human rights violations, but in response to a mention by Mr Peiris of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa had appointed the commission to look into the last months of the civil war.

The advisory report of UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon's three-member panel of experts on accountability with respect to final stages of the Lankan conflict has accused Colombo of war crimes. The report was submitted to Mr Ban on April 12, and it was made public on April 25 in New York.

Since the report was released, New Delhi has maintained that the issues raised in it needed to be studied carefully. However, Mr Peiris removed any doubt about where India stood on the issue when he said in a media interaction that New Delhi had shown "empathy" and "understanding", and there existed a "reservoir of goodwill" toward Colombo.

"There is no single path to the summit of mountain," Mr Peiris further sought to tell a section of the international community, alluding to Colombo's stand that the LLRC enjoyed the "blessings of the world", and it should not be dismissed, at least not before it had concluded its work, in favour of the UN's advisory report.

Mr Peiris' visit came ahead of the second anniversary of the end of Sri Lanka's civil war on 19 May 2009.

He said that the Lankan government had completed six rounds of talks with representatives of Tamil parties on the issue of a devolution package. "It is an ongoing dialogue," he noted.

Mr Peiris called on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and finance minister Pranab Mukherjee. He will travel to China and Indonesia next week.