Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts

NSG tightens rules, but US reassures India


New Delhi
24 June 2011

Access to sensitive nuclear technologies used for the enrichment of uranium or the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel just got tougher, with the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) approving new guidelines to limit their transfers only to the countries complying with their non-proliferation obligations and that meet agreed standards for nuclear safeguards, safety and security.

On the face of it, the three non-NPT signatories of India, Pakistan and Israel could be affected by the amendments, but, equally, other countries of concern could be the targets, too. However, the US department of state has clarified that the new restrictions should not be construed as detracting from the "unique impact and importance" of the US-India nuclear deal or diluting the US' commitment to full civil nuclear cooperation with India.

Simply put, the new guidelines would not impinge or adversely affect the "clean" NSG exception given to India in September 2008 or restrict India's access to enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) technologies. Also, India remains on course for becoming the 47th member of the nuclear cartel, which was formed in 1974 in response to the nuclear test by India earlier that year.

A US state department press release said, "The NSG's NPT references, including those in the ENR guidelines, in no way detract from the exception granted to India by NSG members in 2008 and in no way reflect upon India's non-proliferation record." It also noted that "efforts in the NSG to strengthen controls on the transfers of ENR areconsistent with long-standing US policy that pre-dates the civil nuclear agreement [with India] and have been reaffirmed on an annual basis by the G-8 for years."

Further, it iterated the US' support for India's membership of the NSG and three other export control regimes -- the Australia Group, the Wassenaar Arrangement, and the Missile Technology Control Regime -- in a phased manner. The US was understood to have circulated a note on India's membership of the NSG, proposing in it that signing on to the NPT need not be a mandatory criterion. India recognises that becoming an NSG member will take time because the group operates by consensus, and all members, China included, need to unanimously make a decision.

On the eve of the NSG's meeting, India had voiced deep reservations about a move by the cartel to withhold the transfer of enrichment and reprocessing (ENR) technology to the non-NPT signatories. It had contended that doing so would dilute the import or the message of the exemption granted to India in 2008. Recently, foreign secretary Nirupama Rao had discussed this, and other matters, with Ellen Tauscher, the US under secretary of state for arms control and international security affairs, in Vienna. Ms Rao had also impressed upon her American interlocutor that India's membership of the four export control regimes should be a package deal.

Pressure grows on Australia to lift ban on sale of uranium to India, Labour party split


John Lee

New Delhi
June 15

As Prime Minister Manmohan Singh prepares to visit Australia in October this year, an Australian foreign policy analyst and the deputy leader of the Opposition in the Australian parliament, alike, have argued that the Labour Government's refusal to sell uranium to India cannot be sustained for long.

In an interview to this newspaper in New Delhi, Dr John Lee of the Centre for Independent Studies in Sydney said, "I don't think anyone doubts that Australia will eventually sell uranium to India. I think it's a matter of working through the Australian political process such that the focus is more on the benefits of selling uranium to India as opposed to the strict interpretation of our commitments to the non-proliferation treaty."

Julie Bishop, deputy leader of the Opposition, has reasoned that "the hypocrisy of this decision [not selling uranium to India] is even more glaring in the middle of a debate in Australia about a carbon tax designed to reduce greenhouse emissions in this country, while Labour is refusing to supply the fuel that India needs to reduce its emissions."

Ms Bishop, who recently visited India, is also the deputy leader of the Liberal party and the shadow minister of foreign affairs. Her party had agreed in principle to allow uranium exports to India when John Howard was prime minister, but Howard's successor, Kevin Rudd, overturned the decision after the Labour party came to power in 2007.

In a signed piece published by the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper on Wednesday, Ms Bishop wrote, "Labour's ideological games to satisfy domestic interest groups should not be allowed to impact on our relationship with this valuable and strategic partner."

"It is difficult for Australia to build closer relations with this important democracy to our north-west when this ban clearly implies that Labour is of the view that India cannot be trusted with Australian uranium, despite its strong record of non-proliferation," Ms Bishop noted.

The current Labour government headed by Prime Minister Julia Gillard has continued her party's policy of not selling uranium to a non-NPT signatory such as India. However, as Dr Lee pointed out, India can draw hope from the fact that the Labour party is "genuinely split" on the issue.

"There are strong advocates of selling uranium to India who are in Cabinet positions. The advocates of not selling uranium to India are in more minor positions but they hold significant influence within the party itself," Dr Lee said, adding that when India's rise will begin to excite the Australian population, it will offer "more political incentives" for the Labour party to actually sell uranium to India.